On 5 January 2012 00:54, Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsd...@calxeda.com> wrote: > On 01/04/2012 06:22 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> Can you drop the SCR code, please? This needs to be done properly >> as part of trustzone support, which is a different and rather larger >> kettle of fish. > > I found out that the Highbank SoC model depends on the scr code > through four days of tedious debugging. Would it possible to keep > it in as a stub?
Regardless, it shouldn't be in this patch, because it's not related to the A9-specific c15 registers. I'll have a look at the docs and see if there's a sensible minimal implementation of the SCR that we could implement. > I'm still waiting on Kevin Wolf's review of the AHCI changes You should post those as a separate 2-patch AHCI set, I think. > and > review of the last two patches from this series. These are still on my todo list, I haven't forgotten them. (However I still have a huge patchset from Samsung to review which I should probably do first.) -- PMM
