On 21 December 2011 11:07, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 21 December 2011 01:38, andrzej zaborowski <balr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Since this sub device uses parts of the rest of mpu state, it's >> (apparently) not a separate device, can we thus skip this change? I >> don't see much value in it and it doesn't simplify code. > > If you like; I don't have a very strong feeling about it, I'm mostly > just trying to get patches out of my tree, so "drop patch" is as > good as "push to master" in that sense :-)
I'm going to drop this patch and just include 1-4,6 in the arm-devs.next pullreq I'm putting together. -- PMM
