On 06/10/2022 17.19, Bin Meng wrote:
From: Bin Meng <bin.m...@windriver.com>

At present the codes uses sigaction() to install signal handler with
a flag SA_RESETHAND. Such usage can be covered by the signal() API
that is a simplified interface to the general sigaction() facility.

Update to use signal() to install the signal handler, as it is
available on Windows which we are going to support.

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.m...@windriver.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com>
---

Changes in v5:
- Replace sighandler_t with its actual definition, since it is not
   available on BSD hosts

  tests/qtest/libqtest.c | 14 +++-----------
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
index 8228262938..54e5f64f20 100644
--- a/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
+++ b/tests/qtest/libqtest.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct QTestState
  };
static GHookList abrt_hooks;
-static struct sigaction sigact_old;
+static void (*sighandler_old)(int);
static int qtest_query_target_endianness(QTestState *s); @@ -179,20 +179,12 @@ static void sigabrt_handler(int signo) static void setup_sigabrt_handler(void)
  {
-    struct sigaction sigact;
-
-    /* Catch SIGABRT to clean up on g_assert() failure */
-    sigact = (struct sigaction){
-        .sa_handler = sigabrt_handler,
-        .sa_flags = SA_RESETHAND,
-    };
-    sigemptyset(&sigact.sa_mask);
-    sigaction(SIGABRT, &sigact, &sigact_old);
+    sighandler_old = signal(SIGABRT, sigabrt_handler);
  }
static void cleanup_sigabrt_handler(void)
  {
-    sigaction(SIGABRT, &sigact_old, NULL);
+    signal(SIGABRT, sighandler_old);
  }
static bool hook_list_is_empty(GHookList *hook_list)

Hmm, did you notice the error from checkpatch.pl ?

ERROR: use sigaction to establish signal handlers; signal is not portable

... rationale is given in the commit description here:

https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/e8c2091d4c4dd

... but since we likely don't care about continuing running after the first signal has been delivered, I guess it's ok here to use signal() instead of sigaction?

 Thomas


Reply via email to