Am 29.12.2011 19:33, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> I don't think we should focus much on qtest for non-x86 targets.  I
> mean, if you are interested in it for ARM, fantastic, but I don't think
> we would mandate it.

I'm actually very interested in having a qtest framework for non-x86 for

a) unit testing TCG (execute instruction, check register/memory results)
b) unit testing device emulation

Your v2 qtest RFC is still missing the libqtest C implementation. We
code in C so I'd like to test b) in C, not Python or some random other
language that someone happens to like for whatever reason.

Andreas

Reply via email to