Am 29.12.2011 19:33, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > I don't think we should focus much on qtest for non-x86 targets. I > mean, if you are interested in it for ARM, fantastic, but I don't think > we would mandate it.
I'm actually very interested in having a qtest framework for non-x86 for a) unit testing TCG (execute instruction, check register/memory results) b) unit testing device emulation Your v2 qtest RFC is still missing the libqtest C implementation. We code in C so I'd like to test b) in C, not Python or some random other language that someone happens to like for whatever reason. Andreas