On 12/29/2011 06:53 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> In what way is your specifically configured kernel's TCP stack better >> than the random distro's kernel's? > > > I firmly believe that with qtest we'll end up eventually building a > libOS to make it easier to write qtest tests. > > Overtime, that libOS will become increasingly complex up until the > point where it approaches something that feels like an actual OS. > Effort spent developing libOS is a cost to building test cases. > > By using Linux and a minimal userspace as our libOS, we can avoid > spending a lot of time building a sophisticated libOS. If we need > advanced libOS features, we just use qemu-test. If it's just a matter > of poking some registers on a device along, we just use qtest.
Would there be device-level tests in qemu-test? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
