On 27 December 2011 22:04, Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsd...@calxeda.com> wrote: > On 12/27/2011 03:59 PM, Peter Maydell wrote: >> The GIC architectural limit on number of interrupts is 1020; >> that would (I think) imply a ~64K memory usage by the GIC, >> which we can live with I think. > > I think you just said you wanted me to define the gic internal > maximum as 1020. I just want to be sure I understood you there.
That's "we should define it as 1020 unless you or somebody else thinks that's a terrible idea for some reason". Sorry, that was a bit cryptic. -- PMM