On 9/8/22 09:23, Christoph Müllner wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:46 AM Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org <mailto:richard.hender...@linaro.org>> wrote:On 9/6/22 13:22, Christoph Muellner wrote: > + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C906, rv64_thead_c906_cpu_init), > + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C910, rv64_thead_c906_cpu_init), Why model both if they're identical? I figured that users might expect that (existence of "thead-c906" and "thead-c910"). And using "thead-c9xx" feels like it would be regretted in the future. Should I drop "thead-c910"?
Quite possibly. For Arm, we don't try to supply every cpu model, only those that differ in some substantial way.
r~
