On 6/9/22 12:09, Richard Henderson wrote:
Instead of returning the new pc, which is present in
DisasContext, return true if an insn was translated.
This is false when we detect a page crossing and must
undo the insn under translation.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
---
target/i386/tcg/translate.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/i386/tcg/translate.c b/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
index 1e24bb2985..46300ffd91 100644
--- a/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
+++ b/target/i386/tcg/translate.c
@@ -4665,7 +4665,7 @@ static void gen_sse(CPUX86State *env, DisasContext *s,
int b)
/* convert one instruction. s->base.is_jmp is set if the translation must
be stopped. Return the next pc value */
-static target_ulong disas_insn(DisasContext *s, CPUState *cpu)
+static bool disas_insn(DisasContext *s, CPUState *cpu)
{
CPUX86State *env = cpu->env_ptr;
int b, prefixes;
@@ -4695,12 +4695,13 @@ static target_ulong disas_insn(DisasContext *s,
CPUState *cpu)
return s->pc;
Shouldn't we return 'true' here?
case 2:
/* Restore state that may affect the next instruction. */
+ s->pc = s->base.pc_next;
s->cc_op_dirty = orig_cc_op_dirty;
s->cc_op = orig_cc_op;
s->base.num_insns--;
tcg_remove_ops_after(s->prev_insn_end);
s->base.is_jmp = DISAS_TOO_MANY;
- return s->base.pc_next;
+ return false;
default:
g_assert_not_reached();
}
@@ -8609,13 +8610,13 @@ static target_ulong disas_insn(DisasContext *s,
CPUState *cpu)
default:
goto unknown_op;
}
- return s->pc;
+ return true;
illegal_op:
gen_illegal_opcode(s);
- return s->pc;
+ return true;
unknown_op:
gen_unknown_opcode(env, s);
- return s->pc;
+ return true;
}