On 1/9/22 18:26, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
Resolving the PIIX ISA bridge rather than the PIIX ACPI controller mirrors
the ICH9 code one line below.
Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shen...@gmail.com>
---
hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
index 8af75b1e22..d7bb1ccb26 100644
--- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
+++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static void acpi_get_pm_info(MachineState *machine,
AcpiPmInfo *pm)
static void acpi_get_misc_info(AcpiMiscInfo *info)
{
- Object *piix = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_PIIX4_PM);
+ Object *piix = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_PIIX_PCI_DEVICE);
Object *lpc = object_resolve_type_unambiguous(TYPE_ICH9_LPC_DEVICE);
assert(!!piix != !!lpc);
This looks correct to me w.r.t the hardware, but my understanding is
some x86 machines allow abusing the PIIX ACPI PCI function, by plugging
it alone, without the rest of the south bridge... Then this patch would
regress such Frankenstein use :/
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
