* Thomas Huth (th...@redhat.com) wrote: > On 02/08/2022 10.47, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote: > > * Thomas Huth (th...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > This reverts commit cfd66f30fb0f735df06ff4220e5000290a43dad3. > > > > > > The simplification of unqueue_page() introduced a bug that sometimes > > > breaks migration on s390x hosts. Seems like there are still pages here > > > that do not have their dirty bit set. > > > > I don't think it's about 'not having their dirty bit set' - it's > > perfectly fine to have the bits clear (which indicates the page has > > already been sent to the destination, sometime inbetween the page request > > being sent from the destination and it being unqueued). > > Ok, could you maybe simply drop that sentence from the commit description > when picking up the patch? Or shall I resend a v2?
Sure, I'll reword > Thomas > -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
