On 12/15/2011 08:22 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 12/15/2011 04:21 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

   cpu-common.h     |   36 -----------------------------
   exec-obsolete.h  |   66
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
   exec.c           |    3 ++
   hw/etraxfs_eth.c |    3 --
   memory.c         |    3 ++
   5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
   create mode 100644 exec-obsolete.h


I would prefer exec-private.h or memory-private.h.  Right now, the
situation is that exec.c provides a low-level interface to memory.c.
If the situation changes, the header will disappear.

Since the header is going to disappear, does it really matter?  I plan
on removing it long before 1.1.

I don't think it does.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori




Reply via email to