On 7/18/22 13:52, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jul 2022 18:16:23 +0100
> Joao Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> Factor out the calculation of the base address of the memory region.
>> It will be used later on for the cxl range end counterpart calculation
>> and as well in pc_memory_init() CXL memory region initialization, thus
>> avoiding duplication.
>>
>> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.came...@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Joao Martins <joao.m.mart...@oracle.com>
>
> Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
>
Thanks!
> PS:
> see note below in case series respin
>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/pc.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/pc.c b/hw/i386/pc.c
>> index 1f42f194d7b7..3fdcab4bb4f3 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/pc.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/pc.c
>> @@ -825,6 +825,22 @@ static hwaddr pc_above_4g_end(PCMachineState *pcms)
>> return x86ms->above_4g_mem_start + x86ms->above_4g_mem_size;
>> }
>>
>> +static uint64_t pc_get_cxl_range_start(PCMachineState *pcms)
>> +{
>> + PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_GET_CLASS(pcms);
>> + MachineState *machine = MACHINE(pcms);
>> + hwaddr cxl_base;
>> +
>> + if (pcmc->has_reserved_memory && machine->device_memory->base) {
>> + cxl_base = machine->device_memory->base
>> + + memory_region_size(&machine->device_memory->mr);
>> + } else {
>> + cxl_base = pc_above_4g_end(pcms);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return cxl_base;
>> +}
>> +
>> static uint64_t pc_get_cxl_range_end(PCMachineState *pcms)
>> {
>> uint64_t start = 0;
>> @@ -946,15 +962,7 @@ void pc_memory_init(PCMachineState *pcms,
>> MemoryRegion *mr = &pcms->cxl_devices_state.host_mr;
>> hwaddr cxl_size = MiB;
>>
>> - if (pcmc->has_reserved_memory && machine->device_memory->base) {
>> - cxl_base = machine->device_memory->base
>> - + memory_region_size(&machine->device_memory->mr);
>
>> - } else if (pcms->sgx_epc.size != 0) {
>> - cxl_base = sgx_epc_above_4g_end(&pcms->sgx_epc);
>> - } else {
> shouldn't be this hunk be a part of 4/11?
> (otherwise it looks like it's been dropped by mistake)
It is a mistake :/ in v8 I must have forgot to delete those 2 lines upon
conflict
resolution.
> end result is fine as pc_above_4g_end() already has this hunk (hence Ack)
>
Let me fix that for the next respin.
>> - cxl_base = pc_above_4g_end(pcms);
>> - }
>> -
>> + cxl_base = pc_get_cxl_range_start(pcms);
>> e820_add_entry(cxl_base, cxl_size, E820_RESERVED);
>> memory_region_init(mr, OBJECT(machine), "cxl_host_reg", cxl_size);
>> memory_region_add_subregion(system_memory, cxl_base, mr);
>
