On 12/08/2011 07:15 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > For linux-user IIUC the ABI is relevant, so shouldn't this be > mipsn64-linux-user? We have a patch for mipsn32/mipsn32el. What about > mipsn64el?
The compiler flags are -mabi={32,n32,64,o64}, so no, not "n64".
But yes, we should have an "el" version.
>> +#if defined(TARGET_MIPS64)
> TARGET_ABI_MIPSN64?
>
Definitely.
r~
