On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 02:56:16PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 14:40:13 +0200 > Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote: > > > Le 30/06/2022 à 14:23, Igor Mammedov a écrit : > > > On Thu, 30 Jun 2022 09:36:47 +0200 > > > Brice Goglin <brice.gog...@inria.fr> wrote: > > > > > >> Allow -numa without initiator value when hmat=on so that we may > > >> build more complex topologies, e.g. NUMA nodes whose best initiators > > >> are not just another single node. > > >> > > > patches looks fine code-wise, > > > however something wrong with them, i.e. 'git am' doesn't like them > > > nor ./scripts/checkpatch (which one should use before sending patches). > > > > > > I've checked it's not my mail server/client issue(or whatever) > > > that corrupts them (ones downloaded from patchew are broken as well) > > > > > > I don't know what's going on. These 4 patches are in > > https://github.com/bgoglin/qemu/commits/hmat-noinitiator (rebased on > > master 10mn ago). > > I'm not sure if we take patches from directly from git-forges, > I guess it's upto maintainers. > > CCing Michael, > since these should go through his tree
I could if nothing else worked, but I would much rather get patches that did get processed by patchew and other automated mail based tools. > > > > Do whatever you want with them. I am not allowed to spend more time on this. > > > > Brice > > > > > >
