On Wed, 18 May 2022 12:29:25 -0400 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:13:51AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > That problem isn't new and we already have a bunch of aml_* stubs > > because of that. I expect it'll work just fine, at worst we'll > > have to add a stub or two in case some calls are not covered yet. > > Right but adding these stubs is a bother, we keep missing some. > If possible I'd like the solution to be cleaner than the status quo. > Is adding a wrapper instead of setting a method directly such > a big problem really? > here is stub based ACPI decoupling for isa devices we currently have in the tree: https://gitlab.com/imammedo/qemu/-/commits/decouple_build_aml_v1/ If it looks acceptable to you, I can prep/post it first and then rebase this series on top to reduce unnecessary churning.
