On 7 December 2011 21:12, Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> wrote: > Note that I have a patch that replaces uint16 with uint_fast16_t, > properly fixing the Cocoa build. What I don't have yet is all the other > conversions (Coccinelle doesn't fully do int16 conversion, for example) > to run the benchmarks Peter asked for.
For the benchmarks surely it suffices to flip the typedefs, ie compare typedef uint8_t uint8; typedef int8_t int8; typedef uint16_t uint16; typedef int16_t int16; typedef uint32_t uint32; typedef int32_t int32; typedef uint64_t uint64; typedef int64_t int64; with typedef uint_fast8_t uint8; typedef int_fast8_t int8; typedef uint_fast16_t uint16; typedef int_fast16_t int16; typedef uint_fast32_t uint32; typedef int_fast32_t int32; typedef uint_fast64_t uint64; typedef int_fast64_t int64; ? We only need to do the full search-n-replace when we've picked which one we're going for... -- PMM
