On 5/9/22 19:54, maobibo wrote:
how about put address_space_iocsr as board rather than percpu since there is no concept of "cpu package".
"cpu package" works ok as a device on the board.I don't know if it's possible to have the iocsr address space controlled by the device, especially since it appears that the iocsr address space is *also* available -- or at least partially available -- in the main address space at base 0x1fe00000?
r~
