On 12/02/2011 06:15 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 30.11.2011 22:03, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
Links represent an ephemeral relationship between devices. They are meant to
replace the qdev concept of busses by allowing more informal relationships
between devices.
Links are fairly limited in their usefulness without implementing QOM-style
subclassing and interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori<aligu...@us.ibm.com>
Same thing as in the previous patch: The code doesn't seem to be
prepared for the case that the "child" (this is not a tree, so there are
no children...) is removed. While you could say that devices used for
composition just shouldn't be unpluggable, I don't think you can require
this for links.
I think we need reference counts to handle this appropriately.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Kevin
