On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 08:48:50AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 08:42 AM, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >>>
> >>>- if (sharing_fds[0] == -1)
> >>>+ if (sharing_fds[0] == -1) {
> >>>+ g_free(sharing_fds);
> >>> return 1;
> >>>+ }
> >>>
> >>> if (device) {
> >>> int ret;
> >>Zhihui,
> >>
> >>Kernel should free all memory used by the process after it exits. So
> >>there's no memory leak even without explicit free.
> >
> >That's correct. Nevertheless fixing this helps to find other more important
> >memory leaks with static or dynamic code analyzers like cppcheck or
> >valgrind.
> >
> >Reviewed-by: Stefan Weil <[email protected]>
>
> Please hold off, I'm about to introduce large changes to qemu-nbd
> for asynchronous I/O (including getting rid of sharing_fds in favor
> of the main loop) and and I'd rather avoid gratuitous conflicts.
Okay, let's wait for Paolo's changes.
Stefan
