On 4/19/22 20:50, Eric Blake wrote:
+int coroutine_fn blk_pwrite(BlockBackend *blk, int64_t offset, const void 
*buf, int bytes,
+                            BdrvRequestFlags flags)
Long line, worth rewrapping differently?

The functions with_co_  in the name are obvious, the others might be
worth a comment why it is okay.

Or perhaps should be renamed to have _co_ in the name.

Paolo

Reply via email to