On 11/30/2011 11:03 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Links represent an ephemeral relationship between devices. They are meant to
> replace the qdev concept of busses by allowing more informal relationships
> between devices.
So, links are equivalent to pointers?
> Links are fairly limited in their usefulness without implementing QOM-style
> subclassing and interfaces.
>
>
> +static void qdev_get_link_property(DeviceState *dev, Visitor *v, void
> *opaque,
> + const char *name, Error **errp)
> +{
> + DeviceState **child = opaque;
> + gchar *path;
> +
> + if (*child) {
> + path = qdev_get_canonical_path(*child);
> + visit_type_str(v, &path, name, errp);
> + g_free(path);
> + } else {
> + path = (gchar *)"";
If gchar != char, this is wrong. Also, you're converting a const
pointer into a non-const pointer, discarding type safety.
> + visit_type_str(v, &path, name, errp);
> + }
Shouldn't this be visit_type_link()?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
