On 2/8/22 21:59, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 08:03, Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> wrote:Do not directly access the uc_sigmask member. This is preparation for a sparc64 fix. Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> --- linux-user/include/host/aarch64/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/alpha/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/arm/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/i386/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ .../include/host/loongarch64/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/mips/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/ppc/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/riscv/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/s390/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/sparc/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/include/host/x86_64/host-signal.h | 5 +++++ linux-user/signal.c | 18 ++++++++---------- 12 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/linux-user/include/host/aarch64/host-signal.h b/linux-user/include/host/aarch64/host-signal.h index 9770b36dc1..76ab078069 100644 --- a/linux-user/include/host/aarch64/host-signal.h +++ b/linux-user/include/host/aarch64/host-signal.h @@ -40,6 +40,11 @@ static inline void host_signal_set_pc(ucontext_t *uc, uintptr_t pc) uc->uc_mcontext.pc = pc; } +static inline void *host_signal_mask(ucontext_t *uc) +{ + return &uc->uc_sigmask; +}Why void* rather than sigset_t* ?
Because it's not really a sigset_t, even when it is in ucontext_t. It's a kernel_sigset_t, as per the comment in host_signal_handler. When it comes to sparc64 in the last patch, the glibc type will turn out to be unsigned long. Got a better suggestion? r~
