On 04/02/2022 08.51, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 4/2/22 08:37, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 03/02/2022 20.17, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
---
accel/meson.build | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/accel/meson.build b/accel/meson.build
index dfd808d2c8..b9a963cf80 100644
--- a/accel/meson.build
+++ b/accel/meson.build
@@ -2,12 +2,14 @@ specific_ss.add(files('accel-common.c'))
softmmu_ss.add(files('accel-softmmu.c'))
user_ss.add(files('accel-user.c'))
-subdir('hvf')
-subdir('qtest')
-subdir('kvm')
subdir('tcg')
-subdir('xen')
-subdir('stubs')
+if have_system
+ subdir('hvf')
+ subdir('qtest')
+ subdir('kvm')
+ subdir('xen')
+ subdir('stubs')
Doesn't this render your first patch useless?
No, we don't want to build non-TCG stubs in user-mode ;)
Ah, well, looking at this twice, I think it's ok, indeed. I was confused by
the fact that "have_system" and the "CONFIG_SOFTMMU" from patch 01 can have
two different meanings if the QEMU build has been configured with both,
softmmu and user targets. So never mind, please!
Thomas
