On Freitag, 28. Januar 2022 14:38:43 CET Will Cohen wrote: > Apologies! The explanation (and what I'll include in v4) is below: > > The previous test depended on the assumption that P9_DOTL_AT_REMOVEDIR and > AT_REMOVEDIR have the same value. > > While this is true on Linux, it is not true everywhere, and leads to an > incorrect test failure on unlink_at, noticed when adding 9p to darwin.
Additionally describing the observed misbehaviour is always useful. Best regards, Christian Schoenebeck