Am 14.11.2011 22:08, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > On 11/14/2011 11:40 AM, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Anthony Liguori<aligu...@us.ibm.com> wrote: >>> I think this is an accurate reflection of the state of migration today. >>> This >>> is the second release in a row where we're scrambling to fix a critical >>> issue >>> in migration. >> >> We need to make our mind about it. > > Ultimately, we need to make migration a priority. That's what I'm trying to > do > here.
When you make everything a priority, being a priority doesn't have much of a meaning any more. Our current priorities are changing the entire device model, the monitor, migration, turning the block layer upside down - what's left? Okay, maybe vvfat and slirp. > The first step is to be open about the state of migration today. I > personally > don't have the bandwidth to invest a lot of effort in migration, but I can > invest time in trying to find more people to work on migration, and help put > together a proper roadmap. > > We need to outline and document what we support and what we don't support. > We > need to invest in a test infrastructure. We need a roadmap that we can > reasonably execute on. In short, we need to turn migration into a first > class > subsystem. > > It's not about any single person or any single patch series. It's about > deciding that migration is an important feature and deserves more focus and > attention. I don't doubt that everyone will agree with this. The harder question is who should concentrate less on which other feature to have time to spend for migration. Kevin
