On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 19.01.22 um 15:57 schrieb Stefano Garzarella:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:44 PM Peter Lieven <p...@kamp.de> wrote:
V1->V2:
Patch 1: Treat a hole just like an unallocated area. [Ilya]
Patch 2: Apply workaround only for pre-Quincy librbd versions and
ensure default striping and non child images. [Ilya]
Peter Lieven (2):
block/rbd: fix handling of holes in .bdrv_co_block_status
block/rbd: workaround for ceph issue #53784
block/rbd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
2.25.1
These patches have both "for-6.2" in the subject and
Cc: qemu-sta...@nongnu.org in the description, which is a little
confusing. Just want to clarify that they should go into master
and be backported to 6.2.
Yeah, a bit confusing. These are for 7.0, so @Kevin can these patches go with
your tree?
Yes, sorry, my fault. It should be 7.0
Don't worry :-)
What about sending a v3 fixing the version tag (I think you can just
remove for-6.2), the extra space in the comment, and the Fixes tag on
patch 2?
If you will send v3, remember to report the R-b/T-b tags received in
this version from me and Ilya.
Thanks,
Stefano
