Move the EXCP_ATOMIC case to match linux-user/arm/cpu_loop.c:cpu_loop
ordering.
Signed-off-by: Warner Losh <i...@bsdimp.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
---
bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h b/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h
index c675419c30a..c526fc73502 100644
--- a/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h
+++ b/bsd-user/arm/target_arch_cpu.h
@@ -180,12 +180,12 @@ static inline void target_cpu_loop(CPUARMState *env)
queue_signal(env, info.si_signo, &info);
}
break;
- case EXCP_ATOMIC:
- cpu_exec_step_atomic(cs);
- break;
case EXCP_YIELD:
/* nothing to do here for user-mode, just resume guest code */
break;
+ case EXCP_ATOMIC:
+ cpu_exec_step_atomic(cs);
+ break;
default:
fprintf(stderr, "qemu: unhandled CPU exception 0x%x - aborting\n",
trapnr);
--
2.33.1
