On 2022/1/18 下午7:29, Weiwei Li wrote:
在 2022/1/18 下午7:15, Guo Ren 写道:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:51 PM Anup Patel <apa...@ventanamicro.com>
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 2:16 PM Guo Ren <guo...@kernel.org> wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 11:32 AM Anup Patel <a...@brainfault.org>
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 6:47 AM Weiwei Li <liwei...@iscas.ac.cn>
wrote:
From: Guo Ren <ren_...@c-sky.com>
Highest bits of PTE has been used for svpbmt, ref: [1], [2], so we
need to ignore them. They cannot be a part of ppn.
1: The RISC-V Instruction Set Manual, Volume II: Privileged
Architecture
4.4 Sv39: Page-Based 39-bit Virtual-Memory System
4.5 Sv48: Page-Based 48-bit Virtual-Memory System
2:
https://github.com/riscv/virtual-memory/blob/main/specs/663-Svpbmt-diff.pdf
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <ren_...@c-sky.com>
Tested-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Zhiwei <zhiwei_...@c-sky.com>
Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
---
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 7 +++++++
target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
index 5a6d49aa64..282cd8eecd 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_bits.h
@@ -490,6 +490,13 @@ typedef enum {
/* Page table PPN shift amount */
#define PTE_PPN_SHIFT 10
+/* Page table PPN mask */
+#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
+#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0xffffffffUL
+#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
+#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0x3fffffffffffffULL
+#endif
+
Going forward we should avoid using target specific "#if"
so that we can use the same qemu-system-riscv64 for both
RV32 and RV64.
/* Leaf page shift amount */
#define PGSHIFT 12
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index 434a83e66a..26608ddf1c 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ restart:
return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
}
- hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
+ hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
Rather than using "#if", please use "xlen" comparison to extract
PPN correctly from PTE.
Do you mean?
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index 9fffaccffb..071b7ea4cf 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -619,7 +619,11 @@ restart:
return TRANSLATE_FAIL;
}
- hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
+ if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV32) {
+ hwaddr ppn = pte >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
+ } else {
+ hwaddr ppn = (pte & 0x3fffffffffffffULL) >>
PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
+ }
Yes, something like this but use a define for 0x3fffffffffffffULL
Just as Alistair said: This will need to be dynamic based on get_xl()
I still prefer:
+#if defined(TARGET_RISCV32)
+#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0xffffffffUL
+#elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64)
+#define PTE_PPN_MASK 0x3fffffffffffffULL
+#endif
+ hwaddr ppn = (pte & PTE_PPN_MASK) >> PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
I think the difference may be xl = MXL_RV32 in RV64.
Agree.
Or we may define PTE_PPN_MASK as 0x3fffffffffffffULL, and use type
contrast
+ hwaddr ppn = (pte & (target_ulong)PTE_PPN_MASK) >>
PTE_PPN_SHIFT;
It is absolutely not right to use target_ulong here.
Although we don't support dynamic SXLEN currently, we should avoid
assuming that SXLEN is always 64 on qemu-system-riscv64. Get_cpu_xl is
the right way.
I have moved xl to CPURISCVState in my patch set v6 for UXL. I think
it will be much convenient for this situation and you can just use
env->xl to get right XLEN.
But I don't know when it will be merged.
Thanks,
Zhiwei
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Regards,
Anup
RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
Regards,
Anup
if (!(pte & PTE_V)) {
/* Invalid PTE */
--
2.17.1
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/