在 2022/1/13 下午3:06, Michael S. Tsirkin 写道:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 12:19:43PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
We use to warn on wrong rid2pasid entry. But this error could be
triggered by the guest and could happens during initialization. So
let's don't warn in this case.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com>
---
hw/i386/intel_iommu.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
index 4c6c016388..f2c7a23712 100644
--- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
@@ -1524,8 +1524,10 @@ static bool vtd_dev_pt_enabled(IntelIOMMUState *s,
VTDContextEntry *ce)
if (s->root_scalable) {
ret = vtd_ce_get_rid2pasid_entry(s, ce, &pe);
if (ret) {
- error_report_once("%s: vtd_ce_get_rid2pasid_entry error: %"PRId32,
- __func__, ret);
+ /*
+ * This error is guest triggerable. We should assumt PT
typo
And drop "We should" pls, just use direct voice:
"Assume PT not enabled".
Fixed.
Thanks
+ * not enabled for safety.
+ */
return false;
}
return (VTD_PE_GET_TYPE(&pe) == VTD_SM_PASID_ENTRY_PT);
--
2.25.1