On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 04:20:41PM +0800, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Zhong, Yang <yang.zh...@intel.com> > > Sent: Friday, January 7, 2022 5:31 PM > > > > From: Jing Liu <jing2....@intel.com> > > > > The extended state subleaves (EAX=0Dh, ECX=n, n>1).ECX[1] > > are all zero, while spec actually introduces that bit 01 > > should indicate if the extended state component locates > > on the next 64-byte boundary following the preceding state > > component when the compacted format of an XSAVE area is > > used. > > Above would read clearer if you revise to: > > "The extended state subleaves (EAX=0Dh, ECX=n, n>1).ECX[1] > indicate whether the extended state component locates > on the next 64-byte boundary following the preceding state > component when the compacted format of an XSAVE area is > used. > > But ECX[1] is always cleared in current implementation."
Thanks Kevin, I will update this in next version. Yang
