On 1/5/22 14:50, Alex Bennée wrote: > The various approaches to finding memory holes are quite complicated > to follow especially at a distance. Improve the logging so we can see > exactly what method found the space for the guest memory. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> > --- > linux-user/elfload.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
> @@ -2391,6 +2403,9 @@ static void pgb_static(const char *image_name, > abi_ulong orig_loaddr, > } > > guest_base = addr; > + > + qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_PAGE, "%s: base @ %"PRIxPTR" for %" PRIdPTR" > bytes\n", > + __func__, addr, hiaddr - loaddr); TIL PRIxPTR / PRIdPTR! > } > > static void pgb_dynamic(const char *image_name, long align) > @@ -2447,6 +2462,9 @@ static void pgb_reserved_va(const char *image_name, > abi_ulong guest_loaddr, > "using -R option)", reserved_va, test, strerror(errno)); > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > } > + > + qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_PAGE, "%s: base @ %p for %ld bytes\n", "for %lu bytes", otherwise: Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> > + __func__, addr, reserved_va); > } > > void probe_guest_base(const char *image_name, abi_ulong guest_loaddr,
