On 12/28/21 20:37, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
pnv_phb4_rc_config_read() and pnv_phb4_rc_config_write() are asserting
the existence of the root port. The root port is now optional, and there
will be cases where a pnv-phb4 device won't have a root port attached.
May be we should enforce a stronger link between the two objects to avoid
creating an empty PHB device.
Instead of asserting, check if the root port exists before read/writing
into it>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com>
---
hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
index daa468b812..6bd907f91a 100644
--- a/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
+++ b/hw/pci-host/pnv_phb4.c
@@ -152,7 +152,9 @@ static void pnv_phb4_rc_config_write(PnvPHB4 *phb, unsigned
off,
}
pdev = pci_find_device(pci->bus, 0, 0);
- assert(pdev);
+ if (!pdev) {
We should log an error at least.
+ return;
+ }
pci_host_config_write_common(pdev, off, PHB_RC_CONFIG_SIZE,
bswap32(val), 4);
@@ -171,7 +173,9 @@ static uint64_t pnv_phb4_rc_config_read(PnvPHB4 *phb,
unsigned off,
}
pdev = pci_find_device(pci->bus, 0, 0);
- assert(pdev);
+ if (!pdev) {
+ return 0x0;
return ~0ull;
+ }
val = pci_host_config_read_common(pdev, off, PHB_RC_CONFIG_SIZE, 4);
return bswap32(val);