On 7 November 2011 18:38, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: > This patch adds copyrights to all the machine description files for > all architectures supported. (this is done on top of my vmstate-cpus > series patches) The problem? > > - What should we put as "copyirght" owners. > > Althought I modified almost every line of the files, mostly of the > changes are a conversion, so claiming myself as the only "copyright" > owner sounds at least pretentious, and more than probably false. > > I tried to "dig" into the git logs and tried to came with "whoever" > commit the initial cpu_save/load foar each architecture. I have put > them as: > > * Based on qemu-file support done by: > * Richard Henderson <r...@twiddle.net> > > But I would preffer that the persons involved state what copyright > notice they want, name, address, year(s), etc. (Some architectures > already have a propper copyright notice, I didn't touch them), and > others had an empty file (I put mine there on the previosu series). > > Several of the logs are from the svn days, and then I don't know if > the person was the committer, or the author. If anyone contributed > to the functionality and want to add its copyright, please told me. > > To make things more complicated, when machine.c files were split from > vl.c, they didn't carry any copyright notice at all, should we copy > back everything from vl.c? > > To make things more complicated, it looks like Thiemo Seufer did the > original mips support, and he passed away. So he can't obviously > comment. > > Anthony asked me to send a patch to the list, asking form comments.
Acked-by: Andrzej Zaborowski <andrew.zaborow...@intel.com> Cheers
