On 11/17/21 10:29 AM, gaosong wrote:
gen_rr_i ?
The code is not written completely, like this:
gen_rr_i12:
@fmt_rr_i12 .... ...... imm:s12 rj:5 rd:5 &rr_i
slti 0000 001000 ............ ..... ..... @fmt_rr_i12
sltui 0000 001001 ............ ..... ..... @fmt_rr_i12
...
gen_rr_ui12:
@fmt_rr_ui12 .... ...... imm:12 rj:5 rd:5 &rr_i
andi 0000 001101 ............ ..... ..... @fmt_rr_ui12
ori 0000 001110 ............ ..... ..... @fmt_rr_ui12
xori 0000 001111 ............ ..... ..... @fmt_rr_ui12
...
@fmt_rr_i12 and @fmt_rr_ui12 are two 'Formats', but they use the same
'Argument sets'(rr_i).
What I meant is that there would be a single gen_rr_i function handing the argument set
rr_i; no need for two gen_rr_i* functions.
gen_rrr_sa2p1:
@fmt_rrr_sa2p1 .... ........ ... .. rk:5 rj:5 rd:5 &fmt_rr_sa
sa=%sa2p1
lsl_w 0000 00000000 010 .. ..... ..... ..... @fmt_rrr_sa2p1
alsl_wu 0000 00000000 011 .. ..... ..... ..... @fmt_rrr_sa2p1
alsl_d 0000 00000010 110 .. ..... ..... ..... @fmt_rrr_sa2p1
...
gen_rrr_sa2:
@fmt_rrr_sa2 .... ........ ... sa:2 rk:5 rj:5 rd:5 &fmt_rr_sa
bytepick_w 0000 00000000 100 .. ..... ..... ..... @fmt_rrr_sa3
...
gen_rrr_sa3:
@fmt_rrr_sa3 .... ........ .. sa:3 rk:5 rj:5 rd:5 &fmt_rr_sa
bytepick_d 0000 00000000 11 ... ..... ..... ..... @fmt_rrr_sa3
...
Likewise a single gen_rrr_sa function.
r~
