On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 21:52, Hao Wu <wuhao...@google.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the comment. I'll upload a new version using IF_OTHER as discussed > in that thread. > > I don't know if adding the assertion for type != IF_NONE is a good idea now > so I didn't add that. > If you think that's good I can add it as well.
We would have to fix the existing use of IF_NONE in the tree before we could add an assert. (Awkward because it will break commandlines for that existing use.) -- PMM
