From: Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org>

Commit 4d9b8ef9b5ab ("target/ppc: Fix 64-bit decrementer") introduced
new int64t variables and broke the test triggering the decrementer
exception. Revert partially the change to evaluate both clause of the
if statement.

Reported-by: Coverity CID 1464061
Fixes: 4d9b8ef9b5ab ("target/ppc: Fix 64-bit decrementer")
Suggested-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@kaod.org>
Message-Id: <20211005053324.441132-1-...@kaod.org>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
 hw/ppc/ppc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc.c b/hw/ppc/ppc.c
index f5d012f860..a724b0bb5e 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/ppc.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/ppc.c
@@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static void __cpu_ppc_store_decr(PowerPCCPU *cpu, uint64_t 
*nextp,
      * On MSB edge based DEC implementations the MSB going from 0 -> 1 triggers
      * an edge interrupt, so raise it here too.
      */
-    if ((signed_value < 3) ||
+    if ((value < 3) ||
         ((tb_env->flags & PPC_DECR_UNDERFLOW_LEVEL) && signed_value < 0) ||
         ((tb_env->flags & PPC_DECR_UNDERFLOW_TRIGGERED) && signed_value < 0
           && signed_decr >= 0)) {
-- 
2.31.1


Reply via email to