On 10/20/21 9:17 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
+ int nb_oargs = def->nb_oargs; for (i = 0; i < nb_oargs; i++) {nit: couldn't you just do for (i = 0; i < deb->nb_oargs; i++) or is that too much for the compiler to wrap it's head around?'
That leaves the compiler with non-invariant loop bounds, because memory clobbering inside the loop.
r~
