This patch is only to refactor some lines of codes to get better and more
robust codes.
As you have seen, in qed_read_table_cb() it's nice to
use qiov->size because that function doesn't obviously use a single
struct iovec.
In other two functions, if qiov use more than one struct iovec, the existing
way will get wrong nb_sectors.
To make the code more robust, it will be nicer to refactor the existing way as
below.
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
block/qed-table.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/qed-table.c b/block/qed-table.c
index f31f9ff..8ee8443 100644
--- a/block/qed-table.c
+++ b/block/qed-table.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static void qed_read_table_cb(void *opaque, int ret)
{
QEDReadTableCB *read_table_cb = opaque;
QEDTable *table = read_table_cb->table;
- int noffsets = read_table_cb->iov.iov_len / sizeof(uint64_t);
+ int noffsets = read_table_cb->qiov.size / sizeof(uint64_t);
int i;
/* Handle I/O error */
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static void qed_read_table(BDRVQEDState *s, uint64_t offset,
QEDTable *table,
qemu_iovec_init_external(qiov, &read_table_cb->iov, 1);
aiocb = bdrv_aio_readv(s->bs->file, offset / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE, qiov,
- read_table_cb->iov.iov_len / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
+ qiov->size / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
qed_read_table_cb, read_table_cb);
if (!aiocb) {
qed_read_table_cb(read_table_cb, -EIO);
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ static void qed_write_table(BDRVQEDState *s, uint64_t
offset, QEDTable *table,
aiocb = bdrv_aio_writev(s->bs->file, offset / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
&write_table_cb->qiov,
- write_table_cb->iov.iov_len / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
+ write_table_cb->qiov.size / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE,
qed_write_table_cb, write_table_cb);
if (!aiocb) {
qed_write_table_cb(write_table_cb, -EIO);
--
1.7.6
