On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 05:53:13PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 28.10.2011, at 03:56, David Gibson wrote:
>
> > kvmppc_read_int_cpu_dt() returns -1 on errors. However
> > kvmppc_host_cpu_def() assumes that it can use the return value
> > directly for setting the corresponding instruction support bits. This
> > will give invalid results when kvmppc_read_int_cpu_dt() returns -1
> > (i.e. 0xffffffff).
> >
> > In fact, it gets worse: the common case for -1 return values is when
> > the properties are simply not present. On some machines this means
> > the features are not available but in other cases it just means that
> > the firmware on this platform does not provide this information. So,
> > when there's an error reading the properties we really can't tell if
> > vmx or dfp is supported.
> >
> > Therefore, this patch checks for -1 return values and falls back to
> > qemu's built in table of CPU capabilities in that case.
> >
> > Reported-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <n...@us.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
>
> I already have this patch in my tree, though with different
> author.
Yeah, I realised that not long after I sent it.
> I've added Nishanth as Reported-by on it now and you as
> Acked-by, if you're ok with that.
Ok, thanks.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
