On Tue, Oct 05, 2021 at 01:22:58PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 11:30:37AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > g_usleep() calls nanosleep() and that now seems to call clock_nanosleep()
> > syscall. Now these patches are making use of g_usleep(). So add
> > clock_nanosleep() to list of allowed syscalls.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgo...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> > b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> > index cd24b40b78..03080806c0 100644
> > --- a/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> > +++ b/tools/virtiofsd/passthrough_seccomp.c
> > @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ static const int syscall_allowlist[] = {
> > SCMP_SYS(writev),
> > SCMP_SYS(umask),
> > SCMP_SYS(nanosleep),
> > + SCMP_SYS(clock_nanosleep),
>
> This patch can be dropped once sleep has been replaced by a condvar.
There is another sleep in do_pool_destroy() where we are waiting
for all current threads to exit.
do_pool_destroy() {
g_usleep(10000);
}
Vivek
