On 9/27/21 1:23 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:01 PM Vineet Gupta <vine...@rivosinc.com
<mailto:vine...@rivosinc.com>> wrote:
So I obviously forgot to get the equivalent binutils branch, but the
only rvb branch on sifive fork feels dated
https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-binutils-gdb/tree/riscv-binutils-2.35-rvb
<https://github.com/riscv-collab/riscv-binutils-gdb/tree/riscv-binutils-2.35-rvb>
That is the right branch to use with the gcc that you are using. This
stuff hasn't been actively maintained so we have old gcc and binutils
release versions.
We are in the process of putting stuff upstream now.
Thx Jim. Guess we'd have to wait for dust to settle, as this instance of
binutils can't seem to grok sh1add.uw spit out by rvb-shNadd-03.c
-Vineet
