On Sep 21 16:28, Aaron Lindsay wrote: > On Sep 17 12:05, Alex Bennée wrote: > > Aaron Lindsay <aa...@os.amperecomputing.com> writes: > > > I recently noticed that the plugin interface does not appear to be > > > emitting callbacks to functions registered via > > > `qemu_plugin_register_vcpu_mem_cb` for AArch64 store exclusives. This > > > would include instructions like `stxp w16, x2, x3, [x4]` (encoding: > > > 0xc8300c82). Seeing as how I'm only running with a single CPU, I don't > > > see how this could be due to losing exclusivity after the preceding > > > `ldxp`. > > > > The exclusive handling is a bit special due to the need to emulate it's > > behaviour using cmpxchg primitives. > > > > > > > > In looking at QEMU's source, I *think* this is because the > > > `gen_store_exclusive` function in translate-a64.c is not making the same > > > calls to `plugin_gen_mem_callbacks` & company that are being made by > > > "normal" stores handled by functions like `tcg_gen_qemu_st_i64` (at > > > least in my case; I do see some code paths under `gen_store_exclusive` > > > call down into `tcg_gen_qemu_st_i64` eventually, but it appears not all > > > of them do?). > > > > The key TCG operation is the cmpxchg which does the effective store. For > > -smp 1 we should use normal ld and st tcg ops. For > 1 it eventually > > falls to tcg_gen_atomic_cmpxchg_XX which is a helper. That eventually > > ends up at: > > > > atomic_trace_rmw_post > > > > which should be where things are hooked. > > When I open this up in gdb, I see that I'm getting the following call > graph for the `stxp` instruction in question (for -smp 1): > > gen_store_exclusive -> gen_helper_paired_cmpxchg64_le > > In other words, I'm taking the `s->be_data == MO_LE` else/if clause. > > I do not see where the helper behind that (defined in helper-a64.c as > `uint64_t HELPER(paired_cmpxchg64_le)...`) is calling in to generate > plugin callbacks in this case. Am I missing something?
Richard, Alex, The more I look at this, the more it feels like the following AArch64-specific helpers may have been overlooked when adding tracing/plugin hooks: gen_helper_paired_cmpxchg64_le gen_helper_paired_cmpxchg64_be But... I'm still not sure I fully understand how everything I'm digging into interacts; I am happy to keep investigating and work towards a fix, but think I need a nudge in the right direction. Thanks for any nudges, Aaron