Hi,
2011/9/15 Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de>:
> On 2011-09-15 15:20, Roy Tam wrote:
>> 2011/9/15 Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@web.de>:
>>> On 2011-09-15 14:05, Roy Tam wrote:
>>>> Here you go.
>>>>
>>>> sb16: warning: command 0xf,1 is not truly understood yet
>>>> sb16: warning: command 0xe,2 is not truly understood yet
>>>> [Switching to Thread 13840.0x3140]
>>>>
>>>> Breakpoint 1, arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=4294967295,
>>>> out_ethaddr=0x20af64a "") at slirp/arp_table.c:75
>>>> 75 // assert((ip_addr & htonl(~(0xf << 28))) != 0);
>>>> (gdb) c
>>>> Continuing.
>>>> [New Thread 13840.0x31b8]
>>>> [Switching to Thread 13840.0x3628]
>>>>
>>>> Breakpoint 1, arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=0,
>>>> out_ethaddr=0x22f642 "\"") at slirp/arp_table.c:75
>>>> 75 // assert((ip_addr & htonl(~(0xf << 28))) != 0);
>>>> (gdb) bt
>>>> #0 arp_table_search (slirp=0x19f7380, ip_addr=0, out_ethaddr=0x22f642
>>>> "\"")
>>>> at slirp/arp_table.c:75
>>>> #1 0x004bafbd in if_encap (slirp=0x19f7488, ifm=0x2255978)
>>>> at slirp/slirp.c:709
>>>> #2 0x004b8a73 in if_start (slirp=0x19f7380) at slirp/if.c:210
>>>> #3 0x004b9c9e in ip_output (so=0x2255978, m0=0x0) at slirp/ip_output.c:84
>>>> #4 0x004bf737 in tcp_output (tp=0x1cac848) at slirp/tcp_output.c:456
>>>> #5 0x004c09ad in tcp_drop (tp=0x1cac848, err=0) at slirp/tcp_subr.c:225
>>>> #6 0x004c1182 in tcp_timers (timer=<optimized out>, tp=<optimized out>)
>>>> at slirp/tcp_timer.c:287
>>>> #7 tcp_slowtimo (slirp=0x0) at slirp/tcp_timer.c:88
>>>> #8 0x004bb6f1 in slirp_select_poll (readfds=0x22fae0, writefds=0x22f9dc,
>>>> xfds=0x22f8d8, select_error=2291816) at slirp/slirp.c:433
>>>> #9 0x0048fb87 in main_loop_wait (nonblocking=0)
>>>> at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:1436
>>>> #10 0x00490d10 in main_loop () at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:1466
>>>> #11 qemu_main (argc=0, argv=0x19f5100, envp=0x0)
>>>> at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:3453
>>>> #12 0x0049322d in SDL_main (argc=17, argv=0x19f5100)
>>>> at C:/msys/home/User/qemu/vl.c:102
>>>> #13 0x005eb784 in console_main ()
>>>> #14 0x005eb844 in WinMain@16 ()
>>>> #15 0x005eb068 in main ()
>>>> (gdb) frame 4
>>>> #4 0x004bf737 in tcp_output (tp=0x1cac848) at slirp/tcp_output.c:456
>>>> 456 error = ip_output(so, m);
>>>> (gdb) print *tp
>>>> $1 = {seg_next = 0x1cac848, seg_prev = 0x1cac848, t_state = 0, t_timer =
>>>> {0,
>>>> 0, 0, 0}, t_rxtshift = 0, t_rxtcur = 12, t_dupacks = 0, t_maxseg =
>>>> 1460,
>>>> t_force = 0 '\000', t_flags = 0, t_template = {ti_i = {ih_mbuf = {
>>>> mptr = 0x0, dummy = 0}, ih_x1 = 0 '\000', ih_pr = 0 '\000',
>>>> ih_len = 0, ih_src = {S_un = {S_un_b = {s_b1 = 0 '\000',
>>>> s_b2 = 0 '\000', s_b3 = 0 '\000', s_b4 = 0 '\000'}, S_un_w = {
>>>> s_w1 = 0, s_w2 = 0}, S_addr = 0}}, ih_dst = {S_un = {S_un_b = {
>>>> s_b1 = 0 '\000', s_b2 = 0 '\000', s_b3 = 0 '\000',
>>>> s_b4 = 0 '\000'}, S_un_w = {s_w1 = 0, s_w2 = 0}, S_addr = 0}}},
>>>
>>> That confirms my theory: the template is not yet initialized.
>>>
>>> A shot from the hips: does this patch help?
>>>
>>
>> Yeah the assertion doesn't fail anymore. Thanks.
>
> Now I just need to invent some good "why this is correct"... ;)
>
> Thanks for testing,
I just have time now to make some tests about -net user.
And I found that the User mode networking doesn't work anymore after
your slirp patch series.
> Jan
>
>
