The bitmanipulation ISA extensions will be ratified as individual small extension packages instead of a large B-extension. The first new instructions through the door (these have completed public review) are Zb[abcs].
This adds new 'x-zba', 'x-zbb', 'x-zbc' and 'x-zbs' properties for these in target/riscv/cpu.[ch]. Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.toms...@vrull.eu> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> --- (no changes since v3) Changes in v3: - Split off removal of 'x-b' property and 'ext_b' field into a separate patch to ensure bisectability. target/riscv/cpu.c | 4 ++++ target/riscv/cpu.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index 1a2b03d579..ceb7e01810 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -587,6 +587,10 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_properties[] = { DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("u", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_u, true), /* This is experimental so mark with 'x-' */ DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-b", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_b, false), + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zba", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zba, false), + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zbb", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbb, false), + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zbc", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbc, false), + DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-zbs", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_zbs, false), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-h", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_h, false), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("x-v", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_v, false), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("Counters", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_counters, true), diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h index bf1c899c00..7c4cd8ea89 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.h +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h @@ -293,6 +293,10 @@ struct RISCVCPU { bool ext_u; bool ext_h; bool ext_v; + bool ext_zba; + bool ext_zbb; + bool ext_zbc; + bool ext_zbs; bool ext_counters; bool ext_ifencei; bool ext_icsr; -- 2.25.1