On 02/09/2021 20:31, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 18:46, Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote:
On 02/09/2021 16:42, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 2 Sept 2021 at 11:33, Mark Cave-Ayland
<mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk> wrote:
This new hardware reset function is to be called for both channels when the
hardware reset bit is written to register WR9. Its initial implementation is
the same as the existing escc_reset_chn() function used for device reset.
Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.cave-ayl...@ilande.co.uk>
The datasheet says the only differences between hard and soft
reset are for registers W9, W10, W11 and W14. I wasn't expecting
the functions to be completely separated out like this.
I did consider doing it that way, but felt having the 2 separate functions was
the
easiest to read against the tables in the datasheet. What do you think would be
the
best way to organise the reset functions?
I think having the hard-reset be "call the soft-reset and then
clear/set the handful of bits that hard-reset touches and
soft-reset doesn't" is probably clearer overall.
Okay thanks, I'll give that a go (probably tomorrow now...)
ATB,
Mark.
