Hi

On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 10:58 PM Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com> wrote:

> Both dump-guest-memory and live migration caches vm state at the beginning.
> Either of them entering the other one will cause race on the vm state, and
> even
> more severe on that (please refer to the crash report in the bug link).
>
> Let's block live migration in dump-guest-memory, and that'll also block
> dump-guest-memory if it detected that we're during a live migration.
>
> Side note: migrate_del_blocker() can be called even if the blocker is not
> inserted yet, so it's safe to unconditionally delete that blocker in
> dump_cleanup (g_slist_remove allows no-entry-found case).
>
> Suggested-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996609
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
> ---
>  dump/dump.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dump/dump.c b/dump/dump.c
> index ab625909f3..9c1c1fb738 100644
> --- a/dump/dump.c
> +++ b/dump/dump.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
>  #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>  #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
>  #include "hw/misc/vmcoreinfo.h"
> +#include "migration/blocker.h"
>
>  #ifdef TARGET_X86_64
>  #include "win_dump.h"
> @@ -47,6 +48,8 @@
>
>  #define MAX_GUEST_NOTE_SIZE (1 << 20) /* 1MB should be enough */
>
> +static Error *dump_migration_blocker;
> +
>  #define ELF_NOTE_SIZE(hdr_size, name_size, desc_size)   \
>      ((DIV_ROUND_UP((hdr_size), 4) +                     \
>        DIV_ROUND_UP((name_size), 4) +                    \
> @@ -101,6 +104,7 @@ static int dump_cleanup(DumpState *s)
>              qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
>          }
>      }
> +    migrate_del_blocker(dump_migration_blocker);
>
>      return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1927,11 +1931,6 @@ void qmp_dump_guest_memory(bool paging, const char
> *file,
>      Error *local_err = NULL;
>      bool detach_p = false;
>
> -    if (runstate_check(RUN_STATE_INMIGRATE)) {
> -        error_setg(errp, "Dump not allowed during incoming migration.");
> -        return;
> -    }
> -
>      /* if there is a dump in background, we should wait until the dump
>       * finished */
>      if (dump_in_progress()) {
> @@ -2005,6 +2004,21 @@ void qmp_dump_guest_memory(bool paging, const char
> *file,
>          return;
>      }
>
> +    if (!dump_migration_blocker) {
> +        error_setg(&dump_migration_blocker,
> +                   "Live migration disabled: dump-guest-memory in
> progress");
> +    }
> +
> +    /*
> +     * Allows even for -only-migratable, but forbid migration during the
> +     * process of dump guest memory.
> +     */
> +    if (migrate_add_blocker_internal(dump_migration_blocker, errp)) {
> +        /* Remember to release the fd before passing it over to dump
> state */
> +        close(fd);
> +        return;
> +    }
>

I would move it earlier.  Why not leave it at the beginning of the function
as it was?

Then dump_in_progress() is probably redundant too.

+
>      s = &dump_state_global;
>      dump_state_prepare(s);
>
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>

Reply via email to