On Mon, 23 Aug 2021 at 09:40, David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > Not opposed to printing the size, although I doubt that it will really > stop similar questions/problems getting raised.
The case that triggered this was somebody thinking -m took a byte count, so very likely that an error message saying "you tried to allocate 38TB" would have made their mistake clear in a way that just "allocation failed" did not. It also means that if a future user asks us for help then we can look at the error message and immediately tell them the problem, rather than going "hmm, what are all the possible ways that allocation might have failed" and going off down rabbitholes like VM overcommit settings... -- PMM
