On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:43:58AM +0000, ishii.shuuic...@fujitsu.com wrote: > > > On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 at 10:25, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On second thought, do we want the QMP CPU model expansion query to > > > show that this CPU type has sve,sve128,sve256,sve512? If so, then our > > > SVE work isn't complete, because we need those properties, set true by > > > default, but forbidden from changing. > > > > Do we have precedent elsewhere (arm, x86, wherever) for "this CPU object > > exposes these properties as constant unwriteable" ? > > We have not yet conducted a confirmation of Peter's question, but... > > > On second thought, do we want the QMP CPU model expansion query to show that > > this CPU type has sve,sve128,sve256,sve512? If so, then our SVE work isn't > > complete, because we need those properties, set true by default, but > > forbidden > > from changing. > > Based on Andrew's comment, > We have created a patch based on v4 that works as intended in QMP. > > ---------- > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c > index 162e46afc3..2d9f779cb6 100644 > --- a/target/arm/cpu.c > +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c > @@ -1345,29 +1345,12 @@ static void arm_cpu_finalizefn(Object *obj) > #endif > } > > -static void a64fx_cpu_set_sve(ARMCPU *cpu) > -{ > - /* Suppport of A64FX's vector length are 128,256 and 512bit only */ > - bitmap_zero(cpu->sve_vq_map, ARM_MAX_VQ); > - bitmap_zero(cpu->sve_vq_init, ARM_MAX_VQ); > - set_bit(0, cpu->sve_vq_map); /* 128bit */ > - set_bit(0, cpu->sve_vq_init); > - set_bit(1, cpu->sve_vq_map); /* 256bit */ > - set_bit(1, cpu->sve_vq_init); > - set_bit(3, cpu->sve_vq_map); /* 512bit */ > - set_bit(3, cpu->sve_vq_init); > - > - cpu->sve_max_vq = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, ARM_MAX_VQ) + 1; > -} > - > void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp) > { > Error *local_err = NULL; > > if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) { > - if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_A64FX)) { > - a64fx_cpu_set_sve(cpu); > - } else { > + if (!arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_A64FX)) { > arm_cpu_sve_finalize(cpu, &local_err); > if (local_err != NULL) { > error_propagate(errp, local_err); > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c > index 5e7e885f9d..1ec2a7c6da 100644 > --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c > +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c > @@ -847,6 +847,23 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj) > cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL); > } > > +static void a64fx_cpu_set_sve(Object *obj) > +{ > + int i; > + Error *errp = NULL; > + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj); > + /* Suppport of A64FX's vector length are 128,256 and 512bit only */ > + const char *vl[] = {"sve128", "sve256", "sve512"}; > + > + for(i = 0; i <sizeof(vl)/sizeof(vl[0]); i++){ > + object_property_add(obj, vl[i], "bool", cpu_arm_get_sve_vq, > + cpu_arm_set_sve_vq, NULL, NULL); > + object_property_set_bool(obj, vl[i], true, &errp); > + } > + > + cpu->sve_max_vq = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, ARM_MAX_VQ) + 1; > +} > + > static void aarch64_a64fx_initfn(Object *obj) > { > ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj); > @@ -885,6 +902,9 @@ static void aarch64_a64fx_initfn(Object *obj) > cpu->gic_vpribits = 5; > cpu->gic_vprebits = 5; > > + /* Set SVE properties */ > + a64fx_cpu_set_sve(obj); > + > /* TODO: Add A64FX specific HPC extension registers */ > } > ---------- > > In the case of the patch above, > it is possible to identify only the SVE vector length supported by A64FX from > QMP, > as shown in the following result. > > ---------- > Welcome to the QMP low-level shell! > Connected to QEMU 6.0.93 > > (QEMU) query-cpu-model-expansion type=full model={"name":"a64fx"} > {"return": {"model": {"name": "a64fx", "props": {"sve128": true, "sve256": > true, "sve512": true, "aarch64": true, "pmu": true}}}} > (QEMU) > ---------- > > How about this kind of fix?
This looks reasonable to me, but you also need the 'sve' property that states sve in supported at all. > However, by allowing the sve128, sve256, and sve512 properties to be > specified, > the user can explicitly change the settings (ex: sve128=off), > but the only properties that can be set is the vector length supported by > A64FX. > We personally think this is a no problem. I guess it's fine. You could easily create a new cpu_arm_set_sve_vq() which would forbid changing the properties if you wanted to, but then we need to answer Peter's question in order to see if there's a precedent for that type of property. Thanks, drew > > We would appreciate your comments. > > Best regards. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> > > Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2021 6:25 PM > > To: Ishii, Shuuichirou/石井 周一郎 <ishii.shuuic...@fujitsu.com> > > Cc: peter.mayd...@linaro.org; qemu-...@nongnu.org; qemu-devel@nongnu.org > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] target-arm: Add support for Fujitsu A64FX > > > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 11:16:50AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 03:04:38PM +0900, Shuuichirou Ishii wrote: > > > > Add a definition for the Fujitsu A64FX processor. > > > > > > > > The A64FX processor does not implement the AArch32 Execution state, > > > > so there are no associated AArch32 Identification registers. > > > > > > > > For SVE, the A64FX processor supports only 128,256 and 512bit vector > > lengths. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Shuuichirou Ishii <ishii.shuuic...@fujitsu.com> > > > > --- > > > > target/arm/cpu.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > > > target/arm/cpu.h | 1 + > > > > target/arm/cpu64.c | 42 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c index > > > > 2866dd7658..162e46afc3 100644 > > > > --- a/target/arm/cpu.c > > > > +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c > > > > @@ -1345,15 +1345,34 @@ static void arm_cpu_finalizefn(Object *obj) > > > > #endif } > > > > > > > > +static void a64fx_cpu_set_sve(ARMCPU *cpu) { > > > > + /* Suppport of A64FX's vector length are 128,256 and 512bit only */ > > > > + bitmap_zero(cpu->sve_vq_map, ARM_MAX_VQ); > > > > + bitmap_zero(cpu->sve_vq_init, ARM_MAX_VQ); > > > > + set_bit(0, cpu->sve_vq_map); /* 128bit */ > > > > + set_bit(0, cpu->sve_vq_init); > > > > + set_bit(1, cpu->sve_vq_map); /* 256bit */ > > > > + set_bit(1, cpu->sve_vq_init); > > > > + set_bit(3, cpu->sve_vq_map); /* 512bit */ > > > > + set_bit(3, cpu->sve_vq_init); > > > > + > > > > + cpu->sve_max_vq = find_last_bit(cpu->sve_vq_map, ARM_MAX_VQ) > > + > > > > +1; } > > > > + > > > > void arm_cpu_finalize_features(ARMCPU *cpu, Error **errp) { > > > > Error *local_err = NULL; > > > > > > > > if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64)) { > > > > - arm_cpu_sve_finalize(cpu, &local_err); > > > > - if (local_err != NULL) { > > > > - error_propagate(errp, local_err); > > > > - return; > > > > + if (arm_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_A64FX)) { > > > > + a64fx_cpu_set_sve(cpu); > > > > + } else { > > > > + arm_cpu_sve_finalize(cpu, &local_err); > > > > + if (local_err != NULL) { > > > > + error_propagate(errp, local_err); > > > > + return; > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > /* > > > > diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h index > > > > 9f0a5f84d5..84ebca731a 100644 > > > > --- a/target/arm/cpu.h > > > > +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h > > > > @@ -2145,6 +2145,7 @@ enum arm_features { > > > > ARM_FEATURE_M_SECURITY, /* M profile Security Extension */ > > > > ARM_FEATURE_M_MAIN, /* M profile Main Extension */ > > > > ARM_FEATURE_V8_1M, /* M profile extras only in v8.1M and later > > > > */ > > > > + ARM_FEATURE_A64FX, /* Fujitsu A64FX processor */ > > > > }; > > > > > > > > static inline int arm_feature(CPUARMState *env, int feature) diff > > > > --git a/target/arm/cpu64.c b/target/arm/cpu64.c index > > > > c690318a9b..5e7e885f9d 100644 > > > > --- a/target/arm/cpu64.c > > > > +++ b/target/arm/cpu64.c > > > > @@ -847,10 +847,52 @@ static void aarch64_max_initfn(Object *obj) > > > > cpu_max_set_sve_max_vq, NULL, NULL); } > > > > > > > > +static void aarch64_a64fx_initfn(Object *obj) { > > > > + ARMCPU *cpu = ARM_CPU(obj); > > > > + > > > > + cpu->dtb_compatible = "arm,a64fx"; > > > > + set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_A64FX); > > > > + set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_V8); > > > > + set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_NEON); > > > > + set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_GENERIC_TIMER); > > > > + set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_AARCH64); > > > > + set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_EL2); > > > > + set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3); > > > > + set_feature(&cpu->env, ARM_FEATURE_PMU); > > > > + cpu->midr = 0x461f0010; > > > > + cpu->revidr = 0x00000000; > > > > + cpu->ctr = 0x86668006; > > > > + cpu->reset_sctlr = 0x30000180; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr0 = 0x0000000101111111; /* No RAS > > Extensions */ > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64pfr1 = 0x0000000000000000; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64dfr0 = 0x0000000010305408; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64dfr1 = 0x0000000000000000; > > > > + cpu->id_aa64afr0 = 0x0000000000000000; > > > > + cpu->id_aa64afr1 = 0x0000000000000000; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr0 = 0x0000000000001122; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr1 = 0x0000000011212100; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64mmfr2 = 0x0000000000001011; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64isar0 = 0x0000000010211120; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64isar1 = 0x0000000000010001; > > > > + cpu->isar.id_aa64zfr0 = 0x0000000000000000; > > > > + cpu->clidr = 0x0000000080000023; > > > > + cpu->ccsidr[0] = 0x7007e01c; /* 64KB L1 dcache */ > > > > + cpu->ccsidr[1] = 0x2007e01c; /* 64KB L1 icache */ > > > > + cpu->ccsidr[2] = 0x70ffe07c; /* 8MB L2 cache */ > > > > + cpu->dcz_blocksize = 6; /* 256 bytes */ > > > > + cpu->gic_num_lrs = 4; > > > > + cpu->gic_vpribits = 5; > > > > + cpu->gic_vprebits = 5; > > > > + > > > > + /* TODO: Add A64FX specific HPC extension registers */ } > > > > + > > > > static const ARMCPUInfo aarch64_cpus[] = { > > > > { .name = "cortex-a57", .initfn = aarch64_a57_initfn }, > > > > { .name = "cortex-a53", .initfn = aarch64_a53_initfn }, > > > > { .name = "cortex-a72", .initfn = aarch64_a72_initfn }, > > > > + { .name = "a64fx", .initfn = aarch64_a64fx_initfn }, > > > > { .name = "max", .initfn = aarch64_max_initfn }, > > > > }; > > > > > > > > -- > > > > 2.27.0 > > > > > > > > > > For the SVE related bits > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> > > > > On second thought, do we want the QMP CPU model expansion query to show that > > this CPU type has sve,sve128,sve256,sve512? If so, then our SVE work isn't > > complete, because we need those properties, set true by default, but > > forbidden > > from changing. > > > > Thanks, > > drew >