On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 02:56:13PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 01:49:54PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 05, 2021 at 01:02:27PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
[snip]
> > > diff --git a/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h
> > > b/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h
> > > index 9f18fa090f..d72739126a 100644
> > > --- a/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h
> > > +++ b/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm.h
> > > @@ -470,6 +470,12 @@ struct kvm_ppc_cpu_char {
> > > #define KVM_PPC_CPU_BEHAV_BNDS_CHK_SPEC_BAR (1ULL << 61)
> > > #define KVM_PPC_CPU_BEHAV_FLUSH_COUNT_CACHE (1ull << 58)
> > >
> > > +/* For KVM_PPC_SET_SNS */
> > > +struct kvm_ppc_sns_reg {
> > > + __u64 addr;
> > > + __u64 len;
> > > +};
> > > +
> >
> > Updates to linux-headers/ should be done as a separate preliminary
> > patch, listing the specific kernel commit that you're updating too.
>
> Yes, I am aware of it. Since the kernel patches are still in RFC
> state, I noted this as a TODO in patch description :-)
Sorry, I missed that. In general, even for draft posts, I'd suggest
doing the linux-headers/ updates as a separate patch (but you can
construct that ad-hoc).
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
