On Thu, 2021-07-08 at 23:05 +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 2021 at 21:05:02 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 20:40, Leif Lindholm <l...@nuviainc.com> > > wrote: > > > I think my summary-summary would be: > > > - I think we will need to introduce a compatiblity-breaking > > > change to > > > sbsa-ref. > > > - I think we will need to have support for more than one ITS if > > > we're > > > going to be able to use QEMU to prototype real systems. > > > - I think we should then start versioning sbsa-ref (like many > > > other > > > platforms already are). And there are other reasons why I would > > > want > > > to do this. > > > - But I think it would be unfair to hold this set back for it. > > > > FWIW, I do not currently expect this series to make 6.1, so we > > have some time to get things right. > > Ah, ok. > > Then I would ideally like to see this patch add the ITS block between > Distributor and Redistributors regions. I think it makes the most > sense > for this version to match the GIC-600 layout. Have added ITS block between Distributor and Redistributors regions,with comments. Also,added sbsa versioning support (as discussed in last call) > > I am also going to rework those two remaining gicv4-ish patches based > on my acquired understanding, to be sent out post v6.1. > > And, I would like to switch the default CPU of sbsa-ref to "max" as > part of that platform versioning, now that is supported in TF-A > (from v2.5). > > / > Leif
